Zaraki KenpachiCurrent and former officials at the U.S. Marshals Service said they are worried about an executive order from the Biden administration that phases out contracts with private prisons and jails.
The order, which likely applies to 10,000 of the 60,000 people the marshals have in custody on any given day, could mean that some pretrial detainees are housed hours away from courthouses where their cases will be heard, and that marshals could be diverted from their work on fugitive task forces to transport those defendants over long distances.
“Transportation is the weakest link in the chain of custody,” said Carl Caulk, a retired U.S. Marshals Service executive. “The longer they’re being transported, the less secure it is. That’s obviously a big issue for the Marshals Service and it’s a big issue for me.”
When It Comes To Email, Some Prisoners Say Attorney-Client Privilege Has Been Erased
LAW
When It Comes To Email, Some Prisoners Say Attorney-Client Privilege Has Been Erased
Caulk said the phase-out of private contracts could be particularly problematic in areas where county and local jails are already overcrowded and few alternative housing sites exist. Such places include Youngstown, Ohio; in Phoenix and Tucson, Ariz.; and along the Southwest border, he said.
“I think consideration should be given to allowing the Marshals Service either to opt out [of the executive order] or at least extend their current arrangements well into the future so they can make other arrangements,” Caulk told NPR.
Article continues after sponsor message
Biden unveiled the move on reforming the incarceration system just six days after his inauguration in January, asserting that “to decrease incarceration levels, we must reduce profit-based incentives to incarcerate by phasing out the Federal Government’s reliance on privately operated criminal detention facilities.”
The new president pointed to a 2016 report by the Justice Department’s inspector general, who found that private prisons were less secure and offered fewer redemptive and educational programs than their government-operated counterparts. That study applied only to prisons, which house people already convicted of crimes, as opposed to people awaiting trial who tend to stay in custody for shorter amounts of time and who need to be moved to court five or six times, on average, in a typical felony case.
Brothers Who Expected To Die In Pennsylvania Prison Now Free After Clemency
LAW
Brothers Who Expected To Die In Pennsylvania Prison Now Free After Clemency
Life Without Parole For ‘Felony Murder’: Pa. Case Targets Sentencing Law
LAW
Life Without Parole For ‘Felony Murder’: Pa. Case Targets Sentencing Law
The Biden order went beyond an effort near the end of the Obama years, when then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates announced a plan to phase out private prisons. That directive applied only to the Federal Bureau of Prisons, not to people in pretrial detention held by the Marshals Service. The Yates plan was quickly reversed once President Donald Trump took office and his first attorney general, Jeff Sessions, rescinded the move.
A former Justice Department official familiar with those actions told NPR that “ideally, DOJ would get to a point where private facilities are not used even for pretrial detention, but the greatest harm comes from the long-term facilities.”
The current DOJ declined to comment.
Drew Wade, a spokesman for the Marshals Service, said “the U.S. Marshals Service is carefully examining its existing contracts with these facilities, mindful that any plans should avoid unnecessarily disrupting access to counsel, court appearances, and family support.”
Hugh Hay
